Everton FC Logo Design

Earlier this year, Merseyside based football club Everton revealed a new club crest as part of a rebrand that aimed to simplify and modernise the previously fussy Everton crest. The rebrand faced trial by social media with outraged fans of the club across the globe kicking off (pun intended) about the new logo design.

Get Our Free Logo Design Checklist

Your logo design is crucial to your business. Get our free logo design checklist now to make sure you get it right.

Powered by ConvertKit

Everton FC Logo Redesigns

Rebranding any business is a delicate issue, and ideally, you don’t want to end up on a list of rebranding failures. What Everton tried to do with their crest was something very sensible. The original design is very fussy and in defence of their in-house design team, who were responsible for the new design, I can really see why they wanted a move away from it. The club cited the “complexity of the [old] crest made it difficult to reproduce for certain print, broadcast and digital media,” suggesting they needed a more streamlined and simplistic approach.

When the redesign was released, some of the original elements had been retained. The shield, the tower (albeit changed and, in my opinion, better), the yellow trim and the date of the club’s formation. The quote and the laurel wreaths however went the journey. However, through the use of Twitter, Facebook and other social media, Everton supporters and fans managed to trigger a backlash and a petition was created to get rid of the new emblem. The petition went on to garner over 23,000 signatures.

Everton FC Prince Rupert's Tower Evolution

The main focal point of Everton’s logo has always been Prince Rupert’s tower. Having never seen a picture of the tower before writing this article, I had always assumed that the representation of Everton’s badge was quite true to life. I also assumed that the tower was surrounded by some form of spiralling staircase. Only now do I realise that was wrong. The original Everton badge featured a slimmed down version of the tower, making it appear taller than it actually is. The new logo is more true to life, portraying Prince Rupert’s tower as quite short and stocky and show the ground the tower stands on in a more realistic light.

So as it stands, we’ve got a simplified version of the logo (featuring a new, simple looking Prince Rupert’s Tower), a bunch of angry Everton fans and interestingly enough a petition big enough to fill only half of Goodison Park. Were the other half in favour of the new design?

The persistance of the fans paid off and eventually Everton reneged on their new logo design and said that they’d consider the fans opinions more when they release yet another new design for the 2014-2015 season. A few weeks after the furore of the new logo design died down, Everton put out three newer logo design choices out to their fans, for use during the next campaign, asking them to vote for their favourite.

Everton FC Crest Fan Choices

The Everton fans opted for the first choice, which, unsurprisingly, is quite similar to the logo they had before any sort of redesign took place. The shield is there, the laurel wreaths are there, the quote is there, the tower is there (although they’ve redesigned it yet again, in my opinion, making it look worse) and the date is there, the only thing missing from the original, is the yellow trim. The club itself describes the 2014-2015 logo design the best; “The design is modern and clean but with a strong element of tradition, reflecting the most-preferred previous club crests, while being easier to use across the range of modern media.”

Everton FC New Football Kit with New Crest Design

New Everton Logo Twitter

New Everton Logo 2014-2015 Twitter

To be fair, the “design by vote” thing really paid off for Everton. The new club crest looks really good on the football shirt and losing the yellow trim was a really good idea. The two colour shirt and identity looks really classy and well considered. Nearly everyone seems happy with the new design, however, it fails to meet the original brief.

The original reason for the redesign was to simplify the design and make it easy to use across a number of mediums and it has failed to meet that requirement. As you can see from the Twitter mockups above, the first logo redesign comes off quite well as an avatar. However, the second design doesn’t fair too well at all. You can’t make out the date, nevermind the quote. So in that respect, the new logo design fails. However, it does look really good and retains more of the original Everton logo design, making fans happy.

At the end of the day, Everton’s in-house design team are (I hope) a team of professional graphic designers that have the design knowledge to make the right decision. They advised the direction they thought best and ultimately, they were passed over in favour of the fans. If I was an Everton fan, I wouldn’t know if I was coming or going with all of these new designs flying around. Some fans even took it upon themselves to create a new logo for the club.

Everton Logo by Fans

It was good of the Everton board to concede the own goal for their fans, however, was it good for business? Changing your identity is a risky business, even for the smallest of companies. Sometimes businesses do perform a u-turn on their branding, reverting to their original design, but to announce two complete rebrands in quick succession is very strange and practically unheard of. Was the first redesign so bad that they felt obliged to do it? Not at all. I think the fans and the petition cracked them and the majority won out.

Yes, ultimately, fans make up a football club. Without fans, you can’t sell tickets and you can’t sell merchandise and that means you can’t pay your staff. Money makes the business world go around and football is big business. However, should the fans be pandered too over the advice of professional designers? Probably not. If people raised a petition and said to Asda “we’re only going to shop at Asda if you change your logo from green to blue” would they do it? Somehow, I don’t think so. Yes, football fans get a lot more passionate about their team than shoppers get about supermarkets, but the principles are still the same.

Personally, I do prefer the newest redesign over the initial redesign, however, I don’t think giving in to fans/naysayers was the right business move for the football club and I don’t think it meets the original plan of being easily replicated no matter what the medium. Of course, fans pay the money and they have the right to speak their mind, however, would the fans have given up on the club because of the logo design? No way. I love Newcastle United, if they changed their brand identity and I didn’t like it, it wouldn’t stop me supporting them. In fact, I’d love it if Newcastle reverted to one of these golden oldies;

Old Newcastle United Logo Designs

What do you think of the different designs that Everton put out there? Were they right to give in to fan demand? Have your say in the comments below.

[gdlr_stunning_text background_color=”#224467″ button=”Contact Us” button_link=”/contact-us” button_background=”#34ccfe” button_text_color=”#ffffff” caption_color=”#fff”]Talk to us about your design project.[/gdlr_stunning_text]

Tony Hardy is the Founder and CEO of Canny Creative. He is a graphic designer, web designer, brand consultant, blogger, Newcastle based entrepreneur, drummer, and wrestling fan.

Website

11 comments on “Were Everton FC Right to Rebrand Twice?

  1. martin lynch on

    They should never of passed the design onto their fans.I feel that this made a mockery of the designers trusted in creating a new crest. The rebrand was done by a set of professionals who have taken their time to inspect elements of the design and subtract elements they thought would work better elsewhere. You will notice that the actual tower is the most realistic on the 1st rebrand than the second. Fans like to overtly voice there opinion with social networking nowadays and this online community can just protest with ease over the smallest things and get backing. They are totally entitled to there say but I would have combatted this by doing what Vincent Tan is doing – Not batting an eyelid! Because at the end of the day evertons goal was to progress forwards – and it looks like the fans just want to sit where they are.

    Reply
  2. Jack on

    I think the newest design looks better. Football clubs should not be treated as any other business. Club identity is the most important thing. The newest logo is more simple than the 2012 logo – it is classier. Also, no-one wants a stubby tower 🙂 Everyone would exaggerate the length of their tower if it looked like that…

    I understand that marketability is important, but football has to be about football and football fans, not about money. No-one wants football clubs to start to become franchises (as in America); movable, and able to be rebranded willy nilly – identities assassinated – fans ignored. MK Dons, even Cardiff to an extent, are examples of the way that football is going – modern football is rubbish. Bring on the salary cap – invest the saved money in youth systems.

    The opinions of the fans is the most important thing – they love their club. The Vincent Tans of football want to make money off the club, and play real world FIFA career mode. They don’t care like Fans do.

    Perhaps the designers should have created 3 or 4 logos originally, and put them to the fans. That way they will know that both the design needs are satisfied, and that the fans will back the new crest – everybody would be happy, and there would not be this embarrassment.

    Reply
    • Tony Hardy on

      Hi Jack, thanks for your comment! Nobody wants a stubby tower, you’re right there. Should professionals need to consult the public? Not sure, but maybe in this case that was the best solution.

      Reply
      • Edwin on

        I agree with Jack, the fans are the ones who grow up and love the badge. Many football fans have a tattoo of the badge. Owners just shouldn’t change that, because of marketing. The most important marketing tool of a club is it’s own DNA and fans. That can’t and shouldn’t be changed.
        Look for example to Ajax, they got a new badge for more than 20 years, but it’s still not accepted by the real fans, who want to have their original badge back. It’s marketing technical a difficult badge, but it’s THEIR badge, from THEIR club. So they should get it back.

        Reply
  3. John T on

    I prefer the old school badge of Everton, but as a newcastle fan i grew up with the simple Newcastle badge which was from 1983-88, which i prefer to the crest they have now with the crappy seahorses on it/ Giving the fans a choice of a few designs is a poor idea. IMO.

    Good blog by the way

    Reply
  4. Marco Stevenez on

    Fans perspective- We did not want to pay the exorbitant cost of a Nike shirt sporting a redesigned crest similar to that of a childs drawing. We are proud of our clubs emblem and we felt that precious aspects of that identity had been omitted. We also felt lied to when the club had stated that it had already consulted with fans on the new design
    when this was clearly not the case. We the people petitioned the club and the peoples club listened and I am proud to say co-operated with our request via a properly managed consultation with fans. Thankfully in 2015 we will be sporting umbro shirts, an english manufacturer with a well designed crest. Instead of that ugly monstrosity on a shirt manufactured by Nike, fast becoming an overused over expensive hoare in sportswear.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *